Member since 31 Mar 2014
Total posts 213
I have always questioned the ROI on airline sponsorship of most things. With the recent announcement of Etihad removing the A380 and replaced with 777 in Melbourne, I wonder again. Does this show there is no real ROI (return on investment) for these sorts of sponsorships?Â
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 16 Jan 2015
Total posts 23
Probably makes no sense today, but go back to when they signed up - we didn't even know how to pronounce the name, and it was a big decision to fly via the Gulf. It has served the purpose to raise awareness...
Member since 21 Jul 2014
Total posts 36
Add to that the front of Melbourne City FC's jerseys
Member since 11 Oct 2014
Total posts 374
You might well have the chance to find out the value of ROI with a real-world example commencing later this year, Grannular. With EY withdrawing the A380 ex MEL for a less desirable frame and associated downgrade of hard / soft product for that market, the current sponsorship might take on additional significance in keeping the brand 'front of mind' for the Melbourne crowd.
Member since 21 Apr 2012
Total posts 2,058
Telstra Dome sounds much nicer.... :p
Member since 30 Dec 2014
Total posts 25
Colonial Stadium? :)
Hi Guest, join in the discussion on
Airline Stadium Sponsorship ROI
Already have an ET account? Log in below.
Signing up with Executive Traveller only takes a second and lets you
interact with our community. It's completely free and we'll never pass your information on to
Didn’t receive an activation email? Resend one to yourself here.
If you’ve forgotten your password, simply enter your email address
below, then click 'Submit'. We’ll send you an email to re-activate your account and enter a new password.
If you have not received the activation email, simply enter your email address below, then click 'Submit'. We’ll send you an email containing the activation link.
Subscribe to our free newsletter and get the latest news, reviews, tips and more sent straight to your inbox