Virgin Australia - Velocity Rewards
Member since 19 Feb 2014
Total posts 90
So, Qatar Airways are now moving to a 3x4x3 configuration in economy. For those that travel economy, does this affect your decision to chose Qatar now?
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 15 Dec 2014
Total posts 191
Well out of SYD, the only operator with 3-3-3 abreast seating is CX all other carriers have 3-4-3, with QR to soon start. Yes it will sway my opinion towards CX and away from QR when travelling in Y, but if I had to route through the Middle East or choose one of the big Middle East Three it would be QR.
Member since 02 Jun 2013
Total posts 34
VA are still 3-3-3 in Y and their upcoming refurb won't change this either as far as I know, as it only touches J and W classes.
Member since 05 Sep 2011
Total posts 28
Air China, Air Canada, British Airways, Delta, Singapore Airlines, and United all operate 9 abreast seating on their B777's to SYD as well, although Air Canada are about to go 10 abreast, while United will soon bring their Dreamliner with 9 abreast seating.
Member since 01 Apr 2012
Total posts 75
Still have a bit of time to enjoy 3x3x3 on QR. They've announced which routes the 3x4x3 configured aircraft will be deployed on as they are progressively kitted out.
From 22MAR: AMS/AMM/CGK/MNL/CDG
From 01JUL: DFW/MEL/MIA/IAH
So it looks like the only OZ route to have the cramped seating for a while will be MEL.
In fairness 3x4x3 isn't TOO bad if you are of normal stature and the decreased seat width is compensated with increased pitch. But when you are cramped from all angles (as per the 9 abreast 787) it's jiust awful.
Tom - BA continue to operate 3x3x3 seating in Y on the 777-300 ex SYD also. How long for who knows. I can see them soon following the crowd and going ten abreast. The bean counters won't be able to resist - especially when everyone else is doing it.
Knew I was missing one! Cheers
Member since 07 Oct 2012
Total posts 767
Member since 24 Aug 2011
Total posts 384
SQ are still 3x3x3.
Member since 22 Aug 2015
Total posts 8
Didn't BA try to convert into 3-4-3 seating on their 777, but then went back to 3-3-3
Member since 12 Apr 2013
Total posts 870
Herd wanna save a dollar, so carriers deliver. As simple as this. Saying that I do not like travel via Middle East anyway, so it will not affect my pattern anyhow. AFAIK SQ, CX and BA are still 3-3-3 and all fine airlines that sitting on top of my list. AY also use 3-3-3 in 350 and 2-4-2 in 330 and 340 (that is also not that bad) in routes to Europe, though they not flying from Australia.
Member since 06 Jan 2015
Total posts 23
Except the carrier won't charge cheaper prices to the herd. Prices will remain the same and the carrier will pick up more revenue.
Then vote with your wallet and buy 3-3-3 over 3-4-3 for the same price.
Nearly 100% accurate statement... but then you included BA in your "fine airlines" statement :-p
It may surprise you, but I enjoy flying with BA more than with, say, Emirates. And yes, I flown both. In my list en route to Europe AY is first and BA is second. Have not tried CX yet and plan to do so next trip, love SQ, but they not OneWorld and I avoid gulf carriers like plague. YMMV greatly.
Hi Guest, join in the discussion on
So, Qatar Airways are now moving to a 3x4x3 configuration in economy.
Already have an ET account? Log in below.
Signing up with Executive Traveller only takes a second and lets you
interact with our community. It's completely free and we'll never pass your information on to
Didn’t receive an activation email? Resend one to yourself here.
If you’ve forgotten your password, simply enter your email address
below, then click 'Submit'. We’ll send you an email to re-activate your account and enter a new password.
If you have not received the activation email, simply enter your email address below, then click 'Submit'. We’ll send you an email containing the activation link.
Subscribe to our free newsletter and get the latest news, reviews, tips and more sent straight to your inbox