Member since 20 Sep 2019
Total posts 4
Originally Posted by Rotten
Well KW72, It appears that you may well be one of those Stupid Selfish Sydneysiders who support the idiots in power in NSW who allowed the Ruby Princess passengers to disperse this scourge throughout the nation in the first place. The courageous and well supported actions of the Queensland government (confirmed by their resounding election victory last year) have maintained Qld as the "safe state" where we have been able to maintain a normalcy of life through this. In the meantime I for one am keen to resume my annual travel to Canada and Europe, along with my international house guest who has been (happily) trapped here with ever increasing Visa costs while other idiots continue to deny the medical facts and spread the virus far and wide.
QLD is tourist state, based on tourism and this government as good as shut us down through our busiest peak period where we had the chance to recoup a small amount of our massive losses from 2020 but then the government turned off the majority of this hope by opening the borders too late in 2020 only to then close them down merely 3 weeks later to the biggest money area of Australia. We needed those families and tourists from Sydney to come to QLD to have their holidays, spend their money and inject some desperately needed funds into our economy and local businesses.
The fear mongering and scare campaigns by politicians and the media nationwide is unforgivable. Courageous actions - please, there is nothing courageous about killing our state and putting us into huge massive debt. Well supported - the fear mongering campaigns were highly successful, coupled with the terrible selfish attitude of those like retirees voting for this governments policies so their local cafes, shopping centres, restaurants and local areas remained tourist free so they could easily get carparks, have less people around and enjoy peacefulness without the crowds that tourism brings.
Originally Posted by SooziQu
Wow. Let me pay because I want to jump the queue to travel... either for business or to see family or just because I can. This just smacks of entitlement. No Tracie, the roll-out schedule is based on age, vulnerability and the necessity for frontline workers first. Put your purse away sit down and wait your turn.
A lot of people are hurting with this and being able to get back overseas is critical to a number of people for their livelihoods and financial stability.
There is always more than one side to things and i think branding anyone as being entitled and it smacking of entitlement simply because they asked a question like this is not taking into consideration the reasons behind this. For anyone in this situation this will be about survival and far from being about entitlement.
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 16 Jan 2018
Total posts 16
I hear you "Jmb". I guess for majority of Australian residents, their lives and work are mostly contained within Australia, so the impact of overseas travel mobility is minimal, if at all. Looking at the percentage of passport holders in Australia, we really are not a bunch of travellers as how we like to believe. The need to maintain international
connection is something that won't be appreciated by many people - definitely not by the people around me. (Everytime I voiced out any opinion against QLD government strict measures, I am met with 'if you don't like it here, pack-up and leave'-kind of attitude).
I do not see anything wrong with being able to access vaccine earlier if you really need to travel overseas (and obviously have been granted the exemption to travel overseas) because you do have valid and essential reasons to do so. Travelling overseas for essential reasons will expose you to a much higher risk of catching COVID-19. I don't see why people in this group cannot be in a priority OR, be eligible for earlier possibly-paid access. When you have overseas businesses whereby your livelihood is dependent on the survival of the business, I don't understand how people could still label you as 'selfish' and 'queue jumper'.
Originally Posted by Greg E
Originally Posted by Debsie
I don’t agree with the PAYG vaccine idea but I do see some sense in allowing those who want to leave Australia indefinitely to request it after the priority people have received their shots, and as long as the supplies are plentiful and they commit to not return in the short term. What is concerning though, is this gov can’t be trusted to develop well thought out and equitable policies! ie robodebt?? So watch this space!
Member since 18 Feb 2021
Total posts 1
2 days ago I made a PCR test... the whole process is really awful. I couldn't stop crying after it and I had a headache till the next morning, very bad. Thank God the result is negative and now I can book tickets and fly to see my parents in their property in Spain here.
Member since 18 Jul 2015
Total posts 17
If they want you to pay, 99.999999% chance scam
Member since 19 Oct 2018
Total posts 2
All this talk about getting the COVID vaccine early at this point in time is pointless until all the countries have agreements in place for vaccinated travelers or you could still be spending 2 weeks in quarantine before you can do anything. Don't be in too much of a hurry to race through that gate just yet!
Member since 26 Sep 2020
Total posts 19
Originally Posted by Evans
Singapore Airlines - KrisFlyer
Member since 12 Apr 2017
Total posts 73
Originally Posted by Richard W
Member since 31 Jul 2018
I’m going the freebie option this afternoon 😁
Originally Posted by Neon
Member since 10 Dec 2018
Total posts 3
Originally Posted by j13
I received the Moderna vaccine in the US last year and applied to the Australian government for reduced/home quarantine or no quarantine. My application was rejected and their response was, there will be no changes to hotel quarantine unless the vaccine is proven to prevent asymptomatic cases. Initial data suggest Moderna vaccine reduced asymptomatic cases by 62% after first injection. Moderna are doing further studies to determine asymptomatic reductions after second injection. The $64 question is does the Australian government want 100% reduction. If so, it is highly likely any vaccine will give that result. Are we chasing the impossible dream - elimination.
Can we assume that’s poor proof reading?
Originally Posted by Phil O'Paistree
Member since 13 Jan 2021
Total posts 5
Yes, it was supposed to say. 'If so it is highly unlikely any vaccine will give that result.'
Hi Guest, join in the discussion on
COVID-19 vaccine - paid options
Already have an ET account? Log in below.
Signing up with Executive Traveller only takes a second and lets you
interact with our community. It's completely free and we'll never pass your information on to
Didn’t receive an activation email? Resend one to yourself here.
If you’ve forgotten your password, simply enter your email address
below, then click 'Submit'. We’ll send you an email to re-activate your account and enter a new password.
If you have not received the activation email, simply enter your email address below, then click 'Submit'. We’ll send you an email containing the activation link.
Subscribe to our free newsletter and get the latest news, reviews, tips and more sent straight to your inbox