Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 20 Sep 2013
Total posts 316
Why did QF eliminate the akl/lax route.It ended with the sad A330 aircraft.The route was was of higher yield then at least 4 routes into Asia to which i am aware from QF Sources they still operate.Does anyone have an idea as to not only you would screw the us /Tasman feeder market,but give total market share to Air NZ.
Member since 07 May 2012
Total posts 299
It was unprofitable, according to QF when they cut it.
Member since 16 Feb 2012
Total posts 133
More likely they saw the need for better onward connections into Americas. Thats why they canned Syd-Sfo and fly into the American Airlines hub-spoke city of Dallas for faster same-day connections rather than feeding everyone through the west coast.
Member since 17 Aug 2012
Total posts 1,285
It was not profitable. That's why QF cuts routes, remember? I don't know how they can run a service full but unprofitable (*cough*FRA*cough*), but that's their reasoning.
Member since 28 Sep 2011
Total posts 302
It was done as a sweetener for the EK alliance. Service was downgraded to a330 then declared unprofitable. This left NZ with all but a monopoly on the route, at least non-stop. In return NZ didn't bleat as much as it could (should?) have about EK a380's effectively getting added to the QF inventory out of AKL to SYD, then MEL, and now BNE. Wait 2-3 years, then watch for EK a380 AKL-LAX as part of QF alliance - QF has not as far as I know relinquished rights on that route.
I agree with most all of what you say.Do you see Qf limiting its its own metal even more.Given this route at the time of its dimise still maintained a greater pcm,as some flights into ASIA they still operate to this day.
Air New Zealand - Airpoints
Member since 04 Sep 2012
Total posts 102
Hmm I disagree:From the point of view of a New Zealander, Air NZ has a better product than QF in Y, Y+ and J, so why spend alot of money for a less experience flying QF. Also the a330 was a less desirable option compared to the 777-200ER -300ER and 747-400 that NZ operates to LAX and SFO.Plus the local stigma of flying on a Qantas aircraft means most NZers would stay loyal to NZ regardless. QF only has 737's operating to NZ.Lastly, I do wonder why they stopped the service. Even just having an operating flight would surely annoy NZ and steal (some) custom from them - after all QF is not all that bad - well in Y anyway.
I'd say that the AKL-LAX flight was a holdover from the days when QF was only able to operate multi-stop services to America.
The QFi A330-300 is pretty dire nowadays, though. I flew VH-QPG Mount Gambier back in July on QF82; with angled-flat J, no W and non-updated Y, it really leaves something to be desired.
Hi Guest, join in the discussion on
Why did QF eliminate the akl/lax route.
Already have an ET account? Log in below.
Signing up with Executive Traveller only takes a second and lets you
interact with our community. It's completely free and we'll never pass your information on to
Didn’t receive an activation email? Resend one to yourself here.
If you’ve forgotten your password, simply enter your email address
below, then click 'Submit'. We’ll send you an email to re-activate your account and enter a new password.
If you have not received the activation email, simply enter your email address below, then click 'Submit'. We’ll send you an email containing the activation link.
Subscribe to our free newsletter and get the latest news, reviews, tips and more sent straight to your inbox