IASC approved one Haneda slot to Qantas. They said they would likely add another frequency to Sydney to Haneda. Overall, the cancellation was because the route was not making any money and the aircraft could be used elsewhere. Alan Joyce's leadership in Qantas has meant focusing on profitable markets and if they aren't profitable, they get the cut. Conversely, Shanghai seems to be doing well for Qantas because it attracts more business travellers. Sometimes flying to the largest cities and captial cities don't work.
Interesting that people think Sydney - Dehli and Sydney - Kuala Lumpur are low yield.
Last editedby OZjames70 at Nov 13, 2019, 05:39 PM.
I think you will find they are in terms of filling enough business seats each day. I thought they may try the new Beijing airport with a better slot time but it seems Haneda might be more valuable. They may shift an A380 to Narita.
IASC approved one Haneda slot to Qantas. They said they would likely add another frequency to Sydney to Haneda. Overall, the cancellation was because the route was not making any money and the aircraft could be used elsewhere. Alan Joyce's leadership in Qantas has meant focusing on profitable markets and if they aren't profitable, they get the cut. Conversely, Shanghai seems to be doing well for Qantas because it attracts more business travellers. Sometimes flying to the largest cities and captial cities don't work.
Based on the timing of the removal of the service, I'm guessing they wanted the aircraft for the new Haneda service.
The removal of the service at this time also coincides with the end of the Northern Hemisphere's winter timetable.
True,
But reflecting on it a bit more, there also the 747 services to consider. They're heading for retirement. End of the day, I am not sure that the A330 will be used to introduce a new service.
Interesting that people think Sydney - Dehli and Sydney - Kuala Lumpur are low yield.
Last editedby OZjames70 at Nov 13, 2019, 05:39 PM.
Basically very minimal (if any) business demand to support the largely low yielding VFR (Visiting Family Relatives) and budget tourists/backpackers which makes up the majority of loads on flights to KUL and India. Hence why a long-haul LCC would suit most of the low yielding/"budget" nature of those routes.
The fact that JQ also tried SYD-KUL and had to pull out due to low loads and low yield suggests that KUL is not a viable destination for QF's full service offerings.
Interesting that people think Sydney - Dehli and Sydney - Kuala Lumpur are low yield.
Last editedby OZjames70 at Nov 13, 2019, 05:39 PM.
I'm not sure why you think otherwise?
Probably because the aircraft used on these routes are very Y-heavy in their configuration i.e. AI has 18J and 238Y on SYD-DEL, so definitely low yield.
timothyshears
timothyshears
Member since 26 Jul 2017
Total posts 19
With Qantas cutting there Beijing service, will we see a new Qantas Asian destination?
E.G.
Sydney - Dehli
Sydney - Kuala Lumpur
Sydney - Seoul
Sydney - Ho Chin Minh
or one these destinations from Melbourne/Brisbane/Perth
sid
sid
Member since 07 Jan 2011
Total posts 209
Sydney - Dehli - low yield
Sydney - Kuala Lumpur - low yield
Sydney - Seoul - no local partner
Sydney - Ho Chin Minh - low yield
My guess is more Hawaii or Japan.
brinkers
brinkers
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 16 Jun 2011
Total posts 233
Based on the timing of the removal of the service, I'm guessing they wanted the aircraft for the new Haneda service.
jaseeee
jaseeee
Member since 01 Nov 2017
Total posts 13
They might need the A330 to do a double daily service from SYD-HND (if they pick it over MEL).
planesa380
planesa380
Virgin Australia - Velocity Rewards
Member since 05 Sep 2013
Total posts 77
Originally Posted by sid
Sydney - Dehli - low yield
Sydney - Kuala Lumpur - low yield
Sydney - Seoul - no local partner
Sydney - Ho Chin Minh - low yield
My guess is more Hawaii or Japan.
Qantas has korean partner: Asiana Airlines (OZ)
SYD to ICN QF367 operated as OZ602
pkjames
pkjames
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 21 Jan 2017
Total posts 44
I often see great J award availability from both Korean airlines, suggesting the business demand is low. Looks like they may need to 330 for HND?
djtech
djtech
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 02 Sep 2018
Total posts 375
IASC approved one Haneda slot to Qantas. They said they would likely add another frequency to Sydney to Haneda. Overall, the cancellation was because the route was not making any money and the aircraft could be used elsewhere. Alan Joyce's leadership in Qantas has meant focusing on profitable markets and if they aren't profitable, they get the cut. Conversely, Shanghai seems to be doing well for Qantas because it attracts more business travellers. Sometimes flying to the largest cities and captial cities don't work.
oxy
oxy
Member since 03 May 2017
Total posts 5
Originally Posted by brinkers
Based on the timing of the removal of the service, I'm guessing they wanted the aircraft for the new Haneda service.
The removal of the service at this time also coincides with the end of the Northern Hemisphere's winter timetable.
OZjames70
OZjames70
Member since 15 Mar 2018
Total posts 26
Interesting that people think Sydney - Dehli and Sydney - Kuala Lumpur are low yield.
patrickk
patrickk
Qantas
Member since 19 Apr 2012
Total posts 737
Originally Posted by OZjames70
Interesting that people think Sydney - Dehli and Sydney - Kuala Lumpur are low yield.
I think you will find they are in terms of filling enough business seats each day. I thought they may try the new Beijing airport with a better slot time but it seems Haneda might be more valuable. They may shift an A380 to Narita.
markpk
markpk
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 29 Nov 2013
Total posts 459
Originally Posted by djtech
IASC approved one Haneda slot to Qantas. They said they would likely add another frequency to Sydney to Haneda. Overall, the cancellation was because the route was not making any money and the aircraft could be used elsewhere. Alan Joyce's leadership in Qantas has meant focusing on profitable markets and if they aren't profitable, they get the cut. Conversely, Shanghai seems to be doing well for Qantas because it attracts more business travellers. Sometimes flying to the largest cities and captial cities don't work.
It's kind of Business 101 isn't it..!
brinkers
brinkers
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 16 Jun 2011
Total posts 233
Originally Posted by oxy
Originally Posted by brinkers
Based on the timing of the removal of the service, I'm guessing they wanted the aircraft for the new Haneda service.
True,
But reflecting on it a bit more, there also the 747 services to consider. They're heading for retirement. End of the day, I am not sure that the A330 will be used to introduce a new service.
DanV
DanV
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 04 Nov 2017
Total posts 100
Originally Posted by OZjames70
Interesting that people think Sydney - Dehli and Sydney - Kuala Lumpur are low yield.
Basically very minimal (if any) business demand to support the largely low yielding VFR (Visiting Family Relatives) and budget tourists/backpackers which makes up the majority of loads on flights to KUL and India. Hence why a long-haul LCC would suit most of the low yielding/"budget" nature of those routes.
The fact that JQ also tried SYD-KUL and had to pull out due to low loads and low yield suggests that KUL is not a viable destination for QF's full service offerings.
hutch
hutch
Member since 07 Oct 2012
Total posts 772
Originally Posted by OZjames70
Interesting that people think Sydney - Dehli and Sydney - Kuala Lumpur are low yield.
I'm not sure why you think otherwise?
ZQN Fan
ZQN Fan
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 27 Nov 2017
Total posts 47
Originally Posted by hutch
Originally Posted by OZjames70
Interesting that people think Sydney - Dehli and Sydney - Kuala Lumpur are low yield.
Probably because the aircraft used on these routes are very Y-heavy in their configuration i.e. AI has 18J and 238Y on SYD-DEL, so definitely low yield.