Singapore Airlines said to be eyeing larger stake in Virgin Australia

By David Flynn, August 31 2018

Singapore Airlines is believed to be eyeing an increased stake in Virgin Australia, above its current 20%, through a bid for the 19.8% shareholding of China's HNA Group.

Nanshan Capital, which also controls about a fifth of Virgin Australia’s shares, is also said to be interested in HNA's stake as the Chinese conglomerate offloads non-core assets to reduce debt, according to people familiar with the matter.

HNA's stake could attract bids from existing shareholders in the company as well as other airlines and investment funds if HNA decides to pursue a sale, the people said, asking not to be identified because the deliberations are private.

While the group is open to offers, it isn’t actively working on selling its holding, one of the people said.

Virgin Australia has a market value of about $1.9 billion after its shares dropped about 20% this year through Thursday, which saw the airline report a pre-tax profit of $109 million – its best result in a decade – but formally declare a $653 million loss due to "accounting adjustments" including deferred tax assets and a $121 million write-down in the value of its international business.

More than 90 percent of Virgin Australia’s shares are controlled by five investors, according to the company’s last annual report. In addition to HNA, Singapore Airlines and Nanshan, they include Etihad Airways with a 21% stake and Richard Branson's Virgin Group at 10%.

A representative for HNA didn’t immediately have a comment. Representatives for Virgin Australia and Singapore Airlines declined to comment on speculation. Nanshan didn’t immediately respond to calls and and email.

HNA is selling off assets after racking up one of China’s biggest corporate debt loads in a global acquisition spree. It sold out of the Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and its stake in NH Hotel Group. The Chinese company also agreed to sell the Radisson hotel chain this year, as well as a stake in aircraft leasing firm Avolon Holdings.

David

David Flynn is the Editor-in-Chief of Executive Traveller and a bit of a travel tragic with a weakness for good coffee, shopping and lychee martinis.

autvlr

autvlr

12 Apr 2011

Total posts 68

If HNA sells out, does that mean the end to Virgin Australia flying to HK? Has the China experiment failed?

CityRail

CityRail

Singapore Airlines - KrisFlyer

17 Nov 2014

Total posts 94

Not likely.

I think the partnership stays, and if HK is profitable, why cutting it?

I believe HKG is another route after LAX where it is difficult to get Z Class tickets.

autvlr

autvlr

12 Apr 2011

Total posts 68

I think the question though is whether it is profitable. From what I've heard, loads are very low on this service.

aussiflyer

aussiflyer

27 Jan 2016

Total posts 53

ABS shows May to have <50% in both directions for VA to HK and picked up marginally in June


CityRail

CityRail

Singapore Airlines - KrisFlyer

17 Nov 2014

Total posts 94

Perhaps Cargo might have been able to sustain the route?

andyf

andyf

Virgin Australia - Velocity Rewards

07 Dec 2014

Total posts 122

This is the June Report.

It shows Virgin outbound to HK at 58.3% and inbound to Aus at 83.9%. I would say that is quite a significant uptick compared to May.

Traveller14

Traveller14

17 Sep 2015

Total posts 391

True, but fares have dropped so yields are probably depressed. Unprofitable.

Eli

Eli

30 Jul 2015

Total posts 90

Low fares does not mean unprofitable. Love all the yield "experts" on these sites...

reeves35

reeves35

24 Aug 2011

Total posts 551

Technically this would require a formal takeover offer from SQ. Having said that, most small shareholders have sold their shares under the buyback scheme and the other existing shareholders (basically EY and SRB) would probably be aware of the offer and have accepted that it would mean SQ would almost be the majority shareholder going forward. EY can't afford to counter-bid and Branson is happy just maintaining his minority presence.

The only remaining shareholder who may hold out is Nanshan if it is true they are also interested.

Yusef Danet

Yusef Danet

20 Oct 2011

Total posts 77

I don't see it as the end for the HKG service. If it stands up to funnel PRC traffic onto the (many) HNA group airlines through HKG and whisk them around Aus while they're here, HNA doesn't need to be an owner.

UpUpAndAway

UpUpAndAway

QF

11 Jul 2014

Total posts 293

What a tight rope of investors , I won't like to be the person walking. All you need is for one to fail and what happens then.

DanV

DanV

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

04 Nov 2017

Total posts 123

HNA and EY are already in massive debt. I wouldn't be surprised if EY is next to sell their stake (to repair their own financial sheet) despite them saying otherwise.

Pretty much all of EY's investments from the Hogan era have been failures.

sra35

sra35

QF

02 Oct 2012

Total posts 38

SQ obviously gain connecting passengers by having a stake in Virgin but can they ever expect to get a return on their investment in the way of dividends? Will Virgin Australia ever make a profit? Does anyone remember the saying that Ansett was a great airline but a bad business (showing my age I know). Is Virgin really any different?

reeves35

reeves35

24 Aug 2011

Total posts 551

VA is very different from AN. AN was unprofitable in its core business, being a domestic airline. VA is very profitable in this area already with upside in identified cost savings. It is part of a cosy duopoly and runs an efficient fleet, with an effective cost base and a committed workforce. AN had an aging mixed fleet, inefficient work practices and a bloated cost base.

UpUpAndAway

UpUpAndAway

QF

11 Jul 2014

Total posts 293

When you read between the lines VA is in great shape, never just look at the final line. I’m sure Borghetti is getting several offers with a lot more cash.

Pappy

Pappy

27 Jan 2017

Total posts 5

SQ wants to get access to the BNE/SYD/MEL to LAX route. The most profitable route in the world. This and their previous Tiger Airways attempt is how they will wriggle into it.

DanV

DanV

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

04 Nov 2017

Total posts 123

I don't think it's the most profitable route in the world now considering there's 4 competitors on it (or 3 competitors if you count DL/VA as one carrier as both have an approved JV).

Can't see the Australia approving 5th freedom rights if SQ wanted to replace VA on the Trans-Pac route. They denied Air Canada fifth freedom rights (in addition to denying SQ fifth freedom) back when it was only QF and UA on the route.

reeves35

reeves35

24 Aug 2011

Total posts 551

I don't think it has been super-profitable for about 12 years. It was very profitable for QF and UA when they were the only 2 participants but not any longer; it's still good but not the money machine it once was.

Geoffair

Geoffair

04 May 2018

Total posts 45

Lhr-Jfk most profitable route, Syd-Mel next, don't think trans Pacific in top 10 'though Lhr-Sin is for SQ.

Makes sense for SQ to develop VA and maybe get JVs where it can.

Doubt 5th freedoms be approved since even BA didn't get that in past when they actually flew domestically within Australia?

Genji88

Genji88

11 Dec 2016

Total posts 11

VA's routes to HKG wasn't due to it, being a profitable route, more as a way to reduce the stranglehold QF & CX have

gpr49697

gpr49697

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

18 Jul 2016

Total posts 12

I'd like to see them up their stake and VA to join Star Alliance.

DanV

DanV

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

04 Nov 2017

Total posts 123

A larger stake doesn't always guarantee the subsidiary joins the parents alliance (see VS / DL and EI / BA).

Also the Star Alliance ship has well and truly sailed for VA, since UA and NZ would use their veto to block VA's entry into Star Alliance, unless the future owner gives in to their "alleged" demands that VA "gives up all international flying" and "dump Delta".

I can't see SQ (or any other potential owner) curtailing to NZ's alleged demands considering SQ has wanted a presence on the Trans-Pac market even though the Australian Government are not willing to give out 5th freedoms.

Rj78

Rj78

Virgin Australia - Velocity Rewards

17 Nov 2017

Total posts 8

So would I SQ would be a great match with VA

IntegralMan

IntegralMan

01 Sep 2018

Total posts 29

This is an interesting development, and a bold move by SQ. VA’s financial performance has only improved after QF started to restrain domestic capacity growth. It could choose to ramp up the pressure and bring VA to its knees if it wished to do so.

Also, I note that AusBT has not credited the original source of this story (Reuters), I read AusBT every day and am big supporters of its open approach to journalism. However, it’s missed the mark of journalistic ethics on this ocasión.

msport2012

msport2012

Delta Air Lines - SkyMiles

14 Apr 2013

Total posts 313

I fell that there are two possible solutions:

Option A) DL to purchase HNA’s Stake which inturn would bring them closer together & at the same time bring them closer to VS/AF/KL/AZ = Possible Entrance into SkyTeam.

Option B) SQ to purchase HNA’s stake as reported. This combined with the probability the EY will join *A and SQ is already a powerful member would then = Possible Entrance into *A despite UA&NZ veto

kimshep

kimshep

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

11 Oct 2014

Total posts 492

So, you completely dismiss:

the third option of Nanshan buying a larger stake, which would presumably please the Chinese government more than SQ?

the fourth option of an aggressive DL buying a (new) stake for partnership? Particularly, given DL's recent expansion in Asia.

a fifth option of Branson expanding his existing stake to avoid becoming increasingly marginalised in a carrier which he had a substantial bankroll?

a sixth option of a new investment from a (non-EY/QR/EK) Middle Eastern player with a bit of cash and a desire to secure some Aussie gold?

a seventh option of .. anyone else who may be interested or in partnership mode?

1Adventure

1Adventure

01 Sep 2018

Total posts 1

Well, let’s all hope that SQ does buy the HNA stake. As for alliances I do not believe VA will join *A as their is way to much bad blood. Also SQ wouldn’t need them to join *A as they would be able to apply for a JV in their own right which has greater benefits that an alliance. I see the below unfolding within the next 12 months.

1. SQ buying further share of VA to further ringfence through traffic to Asia, India and Europe.

2. VA will not join *A but actually join Skyteam, despite that many Australians don’t care for Skyteam...it is has strength in its key markets and VA will become a regional jewel. SQ will be fine with this as it will drive overall performance for VA as a solid investment. (2 slices of the pie)

3. Delta will look to buy any additional shares to protect their JV and retain their influence and protect their investment in the Virgin brand (VA JV & VS ownership) as long as VA does not bleed cash.

4. SQ will increase stake to protect their share from the future extra long haul services from QF. VA could look to do Europe and have a JV with SQ/LH whilst benefiting from Skyteam demand.

5. VS will announce that it is joining skyteam by Q1, 2019 when it completes its IT enhancements with DL/AF/KL and launch of new flyclub partnership/benefits.

krisdude

krisdude

Air New Zealand - Airpoints

21 Jan 2016

Total posts 160

I agree with most of your comments. If SQ does purchase HNA shares, it will mean that SQ is protecting its patch in Asia and Europe, South Pacific and Australian domestic services. It will also give them co-share options on VA's Australia/USA services.

With regards to Alliances, I don't see VA joining any Alliances, as there is not requirement to do so.

moa999

moa999

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

02 Jul 2011

Total posts 1377

Also note that due to takeover laws designed to protect minorities, any of the existing large shareholders can't just buy one of the others stakes without making a full or partial takeover bid

Rj78

Rj78

Virgin Australia - Velocity Rewards

17 Nov 2017

Total posts 8

lets hope they will do it

deva22

deva22

11 Dec 2016

Total posts 5

Why is everyone so obsessed with VA joining an alliance? It seems to me that alliances aren't the best way to manage airline partnerships as the airline in question doesn't get complete control over their friends vs enemies. E.g. QF/CX competing on the same routes. If I had an airline, I'd want to partner with specific airlines based on their locations mainly and then other factors like common customer base appeal.

Sure, I get that pax love alliances, but it doesn't necessarily make sense for the business to pursue it.

Rj78

Rj78

Virgin Australia - Velocity Rewards

17 Nov 2017

Total posts 8

im more for VA to be taken over by SQ

Rod H

Rod H

Virgin Australia - Velocity Rewards

06 Mar 2015

Total posts 121

If SQ goes ahead and it is approved by the FIRB then it will be really great for VA. ( I am presuming this would have to go before the FIRB ) I would dearly love to see VA start to boom and show " Rat Air " that they are a really serious good competitor. Go VA!!!!!!!!

P.S I don't work for them or have any type connection , just a very satisfied passenger.

reeves35

reeves35

24 Aug 2011

Total posts 551

I assume it would be pretty much waved through by FIRB. It is the transfer of already foreign held shares, Singapore is a preferred AU trading partner and there are few, if any, local investors who would be interested in significant airline investments. If you want to make serious money in aviation in AU, buy an airport not an airline.

Jazzop

Jazzop

02 Dec 2016

Total posts 84

If SQ did purchase HNAs share and possibly EYs, then what would they prefer, Air NZ in Star or VA? Is that possible? Considering how NZ and QF are getting closer, I wouldn't be happy if I was SQ or UA.

Also what about DL? Wouldn't they be interested?

DanV

DanV

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

04 Nov 2017

Total posts 123

The other (very very less likely) alternative: SQ leaving Star and joining SkyTeam with VA.

Saying that I can't see SQ or NZ leaving *A. The door however has pretty much shut on VA joining *A courtesy of NZ (the ugly breakup and the allegations coming out of that) and UA (DL's competitor).

DanV

DanV

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

04 Nov 2017

Total posts 123

And almost 12 months has past since this article has posted, and this late post is in reply in light of the recent Turkish Airlines rumours combined with yet another "fake news" rumour from SQ for 2019.

IMO SQ should be disregarded as a "serious bidder" for any VA stake in the future until it's actually confirmed
Every year an article from the media always posts stories about SQ "rumours" of buying an extended VA stake on a annual basis and it turns out to be "Fake News" everytime.


Hi Guest, join in the discussion on Singapore Airlines said to be eyeing larger stake in Virgin Australia